Showing posts with label Therapeutic prosedures. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Therapeutic prosedures. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Tagged under: ,

Endoscopic foreign body removal



The ingestion of foreign bodies is most commonly a problem in young children aged 6 months to 5 years, but can affect children of all ages (those younger than 6 months can occasionally ingest materials with the aid of older siblings during play). It may be an event witnessed by parents. It occurs much less frequently in older children and adults but does affect these groups rarely. It usually occurs accidentally but can result from deliberate ingestion. Patients with mental illness,[1] intellectual impairment, prisoners[2] or 'drug-mules'/'body-packers'[3] (those involved in the smuggling of illicit drugs concealed in the gastrointestinal tract) are prone to problems caused by purposeful ingestion of foreign bodies. Trichobezoar is a rare condition where hair ingestion leads to formation of a hair ball in the stomach.[4]

Virtually any object small enough to pass through the pharynx may be swallowed. Items commonly ingested by children include coins, small toys, pencils, pens and their tops, batteries, safety pins, needles and hairpins - they are mainly radio-opaque. Food-related items, such as fish and chicken bones, are more often ingested by older children and adults and tend to be radiolucent. In adults, dentures or parts from dentures can be swallowed accidentally and are reported in the literature.[5] The swallowing of foreign bodies during dental procedures does not occur very often.[6]

The majority of ingested foreign bodies will pass safely through the gut and be passed with faeces (those that reach the stomach have an 80-90% chance of passage),[7] but some will cause damage to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and/or become lodged.[8]Patients swallowing foreign bodies are usually asymptomatic but symptoms can result. It may even lead to life-threatening obstruction of the upper GI and respiratory tracts.
It is difficult to estimate the incidence of accidental ingestion of foreign bodies in children, but it is common. A five-year survey in a large urban American emergency department found 255 cases of oesophageal foreign body affecting children, 214 of which followed a witnessed ingestion.[9] A cross-sectional survey found that of 1,500 parents, 4% reported the swallowing of a coin by their child - the most common object swallowed by youngsters.[10]
Presentation
This is highly variable and depends on whether it is a child or an adult. In children the event may have been witnessed, reported by the child, or be suspected/discovered subsequently when a child becomes ill. Any symptoms or signs are also largely dependent on where any lodged object is impacted. About 75% of children who have an impacted foreign body will have it at the level of the upper oesophageal sphincter, with roughly 70% of affected adults having impaction at the level of the lower oesophageal sphincter.[7]

Oropharyngeal foreign bodies

  • Overall, about 60% of foreign bodies become trapped at this level (commonly at, or just below, the level of the cricopharyngeus muscle).
  • Patients usually have a clear sensation of something being trapped that is relatively well localised.
  • Small linear items such as bones and toothpicks are often trapped at this level, from the tonsils/posterior tongue to the vallecula and upper oesophagus.
  • There is usually discomfort ranging from mild to quite severe.
  • Drooling and an inability to swallow may be present.
  • Airway compromise may occur if large objects are trapped.
  • A delayed presentation with infection or perforation may occur with objects that become stuck at this level.

Oesophageal foreign bodies

  • In adults, there is usually an acute presentation following ingestion of an object or food item that becomes stuck.
  • There tends to be a vague sensation of something being stuck in the centre of the chest or epigastric region, indicating that the object is probably at the level of the aortic cross-over or the lower oesophageal sphincter.
  • There may be dysphagia for the remainder of the meal, prompting presentation or salivary pooling/drooling if there is complete oesophageal obstruction.
  • This presentation appears to be more common in those who use dentures, eat meat and concurrently consume alcohol.[7]
  • Children with oesophageal impaction tend to have a less clear-cut presentation, although there may have been a witnessed swallowing event.
  • Gagging, vomiting, retching, neck and/or throat pain are more common presentations in children with oesophageal foreign bodies.
  • Children with partial oesophageal obstruction may present with a chronic course featuring inability to feed, failure to thrive, fever, recurrent aspiration pneumonitis/pneumonia or respiratory embarrassment/stridor (due to tracheal impingement).

Sub-oesophageal foreign bodies

These may present with a range of symptoms depending on the degree of progression of the object through the gut. Vague symptoms, such as abdominal distension and discomfort, fever, recurrent vomiting, passing rectal blood/melaena and/or other symptoms of acute or subacute intestinal obstruction, may be present.

Symptoms due to gastrointestinal (GI) perforation

If an object perforates the oesophagus, it tends to cause acute mediastinitis with chest pain, dyspnoea and severe odynophagia (pain associated with swallowing), along with signs of pneumonitis/pleural effusion.[11] Perforation below the level of the oesophagus will cause symptoms and signs of acute/subacute peritonitis.

Examination of the patient with definite/suspected foreign body ingestion/entrapment

This is often unhelpful, but careful examination should be carried out for acute clinical and medicolegal reasons:
  • Assess the airway and respiratory function to exclude/highlight any compromise.
  • Check vital signs to exclude impending catastrophic presentation due to airway obstruction or acute GI perforation, or fever in case of delayed presentation.
  • Open the mouth and observe the oropharynx with a bright light.
  • Consider indirect laryngoscopy and/or fibre-optic examination of the pharynx if you have appropriate equipment and a sufficiently experienced practitioner available.
  • Gently palpate the neck and assess tracheal position/compression.
  • Formally examine the chest and listen to the lungs.
  • Perform a cardiovascular examination.
  • Carefully examine the abdomen.
Differential diagnosis
  • This clinical scenario is unlikely to be confused with another illness, with the possible exception of space-occupying oesophageal pathology - eg oesophageal carcinoma causing obstruction of a normal food bolus.
  • Always consider the possibility that a foreign body has been inhaled, particularly if a patient presents acutely with respiratory compromise or with chronic chest symptoms.
  • An acute presentation of mediastinitis may be due to perforation by a swallowed foreign body, or the primary form of the disease.[11]
  • Retropharyngeal abscess can cause similar symptoms to impacted objects in the upper oesophageal area.
  • Pneumomediastinum can present similarly, where there is a pneumothorax into the mediastinal portion of pleura.
Blood tests are usually unhelpful, with the exception of chronic presentations or febrile patients where FBC/ESR may provide useful clues as to the cause of symptoms.
  • Plain X-rays:
    Where there is a history of a swallowed radio-opaque object that may be located within the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, plain X-ray should be carried out to confirm or refute the possibility of oesophageal entrapment. This need not be done urgently if occurring out-of-hours and the patient is well, but should be performed at the earliest opportunity when radiology services are available. If there is a suspicion of swallowing a button battery, then X-rays and further treatment should be performed urgently.
    • Where the ingested object is not radio-opaque, X-ray investigations are unlikely to help and will probably only delay more relevant investigations such as upper GI endoscopy.
    • Very small children can be imaged using a mouth-to-anus radiograph.
    • In adults, a PA and lateral chest radiograph and/or plain abdominal X-ray are more useful.
    • Only about 20-50% of food bones will be visible on X-rays.[7]
    • Coins in the oesophagus usually appear in a coronal alignment on frontal radiographs (ie seen as a disc).
    • Coins in the trachea are more usually seen in a saggital orientation on frontal radiographs, due to the incompleteness of tracheal cartilage rings posteriorly (ie seen 'edge-on').
  • CT scans:
    • CT scanning of the thorax/abdomen is highly useful for locating entrapped objects of various types and considered superior by many to plain X-ray imaging.[7]
    • CT scanning is the investigation of choice if there is reason to suspect perforation or abscess formation.
    • Not all cases of acute dysphagia/odynophagia due to food bones should have CT scanning, as only a minority (17-25%) of those who have the sensation of a trapped foreign body after eating will actually have one present, the remainder having the sensation due to mucosal injury.
  • Endoscopy:
    • Urgent endoscopy is mandatory in cases where there is airway obstruction or evidence of other severe complications.
    • Where there is a clear history of swallowing objects, such as toothpicks and/or aluminium bottle caps/can rings, endoscopy is the investigation/procedure of choice, as there is a high rate of complications with such objects.[7]
    • Where the history of ingestion of such objects is not so clear-cut, consider CT first to detect the object.[7]
    • Definite indications for endoscopy are objects that are sharp, non-radio-opaque, elongated, or where there are multiple swallowed objects or a high risk of oesophageal injury (eg button batteries).[7]
    • Endoscopy is also indicated for gastric or proximal-duodenal foreign bodies that have a diameter of >2 cm, a length of >5-7 cm or are eccentrically-shaped and prone to enlodgement/perforation, such as open safety pins.[7]
    • Endoscopy is a relatively safe procedure in experienced hands, but costly, and should therefore be avoided as a routine intervention if possible.
  • Other tests:
    • Barium swallows are sometimes used to detect non-radio-opaque items but CT is usually preferred, as there is a better yield and barium must be avoided where there is reason to suspect perforation (gastrografin usually being used in its place).
    • Hand-held metal detectors can be used to trace the passage of metallic objects through the GI tract and reduce exposure to ionising radiation during follow-up; their specificity of localisation is poor, particularly in the upper GI tract. They can, however, indicate where it is likely that there is a trapped metal oesophageal object that requires further investigation.
  • Act quickly to locate and remove any object that may be causing acute upper airway obstruction.
  • Where airway obstruction is life-threatening and an object cannot be removed then obtain urgent senior A&E/anaesthetic/ENT advice and/or consider cricothyroidotomyas a life-saving procedure.
  • Patients outside of hospital with significant airway/gastrointestinal (GI) obstruction should be transferred as an emergency, in a sitting position, with a suction catheter available for them to use to remove obstructed saliva.
  • Children with upper GI obstruction and/or airway compromise should be allowed to stay in their parent's arms whilst being transferred to, or assessed in, hospital, to reduce anxiety and worsening airway embarrassment.
  • Indications of instability or a need for urgent transfer to hospital include:
    • Airway compromise.
    • Drooling.
    • Inability to swallow fluids.
    • Sepsis.
    • Suspicion of intestinal perforation.
    • Evidence of active bleeding.
    • Clear history of ingestion of a button battery.
  • Those with objects lodged in the oesophagus will usually require some form of intervention to prevent ulceration and/or other complications; options include endoscopy, removal with a Foley® catheter, bougienage (use of a stiff rod to push objects such as coins past the lower oesophageal sphincter) and medical therapy to dilate the lower oesophageal sphincter.
  • Stable patients who have swallowed small, smooth objects, who have no evidence of oesophageal entrapment, otherwise negative imaging, and with no evidence of damage, can often be managed conservatively with follow-up at 24 hours or so to check that they remain well; passage of objects in stool may take days to weeks and parents should observe for their presence.
  • Patients with stomach or small-intestine foreign bodies of width <2 cm or length <6 cm can be discharged home with instructions on symptoms that should prompt their re-attendance; patients with larger or sharp objects in these areas should be referred to a gastroenterologist who may carry out serial X-rays.
  • Narcotic 'body packers'/'drug mules' should be followed up and monitored as inpatients due to the risk of drug toxicity; they may need bowel irrigation and/or surgical intervention if there is any evidence of systemic effects of leaking narcotics (endoscopy is not recommended, as it tends to release drugs from the packages).[3][7]
  • Adult patients with oesophageal entrapment of food bolus or other food-related objects should be considered for referral to a gastroenterologist, as there is a significant incidence of oesophageal lesions such as carcinoma in these patients.[7]Hyoscine may be useful in cases of food bolus obstruction.[12]
  • Oropharyngeal foreign bodies:
    • Scratches and lacerations of oropharyngeal mucosa.
    • Perforation.
    • Retropharyngeal abscess.
    • Soft-tissue infection or abscess.
  • Oesophageal foreign bodies:
    • Scratches, lacerations or abrasions of mucosa.
    • Oesophageal necrosis (beware swallowed button batteries in children).
    • Retropharyngeal abscess.
    • Oesophageal stricture.
    • Oesophageal perforation and subsequent para-oesophageal abscess.
    • Mediastinitis.
    • Pneumothorax and/or pneumomediastinum.
    • Pericarditis/cardiac tamponade.
    • Tracheo-oesophageal fistula (especially swallowed button batteries in children).
    • Aorto-oesophageal fistulae or other mediastinal vascular injury.
  • Gastric/small-intestine foreign bodies:
    • Entrapment of an object within a Meckel's diverticulum.
    • Perforation leading to peritonitis and advanced sepsis.
    • Acute or subacute small-intestinal obstruction.
    • Metal poisoning (coins).[13]
On the whole, prognosis is good, especially with appropriate investigation, management and follow-up. Most patients with ingested foreign bodies will suffer no significant sequelae. However, a minority of people will have complications and, given that this is a relatively common phenomenon, a significant number of people die as a result of foreign body ingestion - estimated at 1,500 deaths annually in the USA.[7]
Tagged under: ,

Polypectomy




"Polyps are relatively common in children. Many of these are juvenile polyps which are not cancerous. Some polyps occur as part of a polyposis syndrome. As part of both the evaluation and treatment of polyps, they are removed endoscopically by polypectomy. This is done through the colonoscope if the polyps are in the colon (large intestine) which is the most common location, or through the endoscope if the polyps are in the stomach or small intestine. If the polyp is very small, it may be removed with a biopsy forcep which is passed through the endoscope or colonoscope. If the polyp is larger, the base of the polyp is grabbed by a snare which is passed through the endoscope or colonoscope. This allows the polyp to be taken off.  Whether removed by biopsy forceps or snare, the polyp is sent to pathology to be examined under a microscope to determine what type of polyp it is."

A polypectomy is the medical term for the surgical removal of a polyp. Your doctor may have found a polyp in your digestive tract when you had a colonoscopy (for a description of this procedure see "Colonoscopy"). A polyp is a mass of tissue that has grown on the inside wall of your intestines, but it should not be there (See Polyps in the Gastrointestinal Tract). The doctor has to remove it and test the tissue to see if it is simply extra tissue or if it is cancerous.

What will the procedure involve?
You will be given medicine that will help you go to sleep. The procedure is similar to a colonoscopy in that the doctor will place a small, flexible tube through your rectum into the colon. The doctor will then be able to place an instrument in the tube to get to the site of the polyp so that he can take it out.

Before and After the Procedure
In the weeks prior to the procedure you will need to take acetaminophen instead of aspirin or ibuprofen in order to decrease the chances of increased bleeding during the procedure. You will also need to prepare for the procedure in the same way that you would for a colonoscopy (see "Colonoscopy Preparation").
Following the procedure, you may feel some discomfort due to increased gas or abdominal cramping. You may also have a small amount of rectal bleeding, which is normal.

When to Call the Doctor
You should have your parents call the doctor if you experience:
  • Severe abdominal pain
  • A large amount of rectal bleeding
  • Fever
  • Symptoms becoming worse

Friday, February 21, 2014

Tagged under: , ,

What is percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy (PEG) in children? How is percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy (PEG) performed in children?

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tubes were first described in 1980 for use in children. PEG feeding tubes are now increasingly used for enteral nutrition for both children and adults. PEG may be used with a jejunal extension. 
PEG feeding is used where patients cannot maintain adequate nutrition with oral intake. However, the simplicity of PEG feeding has led to some to be concerned about its use when there is little or no clinical benefit.
There are sometimes ethical factors to consider (see 'Ethical dilemmas', below). Several court cases have considered use of PEG feeding in patients who have lost the capacity for self-determination.

Indications
In the past, it was considered that the lower limit of body weight to insert PEG tubes should be 10 kg but PEG has been reported to be inserted safely in infants with a weight as low as 2.3 kg. The use of PEG may be indicated for children with:
· Neurological disorders with inability to swallow or dysphagia.
· Craniofacial abnormalities.
· Oncology problems with malnutrition.
· Other clinical conditions that lead to wasting and malnutrition - eg, chronic kidney disease, cystic fibrosis, metabolic problems, chronic infection such as HIV, cardiac disorders, short bowel syndrome and Crohn’s disease.

Contra-indications to PEG 
·Absolute contra-indications for using PEG in children are bleeding disorders, severe 
ascites, peritonitis, pharyngeal or oesophageal obstruction and during periods of acute 
severe illness.
·Relative contra-indications for use of PEG include acute severe illness, 
anorexia, previous gastric surgery, peritonitis, ascites, and gastric outlet obstruction.

Cautions
·Infection: active systemic infection increases the risk of early mortality and morbidity 
post-PEG placement. Elevation of serum CRP is the most accurate prognostic indicator of 
poor outcome.
·Other comorbidity: poorer outcome, with increased PEG site and systemic infection 
have been reported in patients with diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary 
disease and low albumin levels.
·Ventriculo-peritoneal shunts: placement of PEG tubes increases the risk of shunt 
infection but this risk decreases with increased time between shunt insertion and PEG 
insertion. Prophylactic antibiotics may further reduce the infection risk.
·         Anatomical considerations: in patients with severe kyphoscoliosis, the stomach is often intrathoracic. This particularly applies to patients with cerebral palsy. Radiological and endoscopic approaches may be impossible. A combined laparoscopic and endoscopic approach can be tried but this requires a general anaesthetic, which also represents a considerable risk for the patient.

PEG insertion method
·         In children, PEG tube insertion is performed under general anaesthesia. A single dose of intravenous antibiotic is given.
·         After insertion of the gastroscope into the stomach and a gentle insufflation of air, the most transluminant point of indentation on the anterior abdominal wall is marked.
·         After sterilising the skin of the anterior abdominal wall and infiltration of this point with local anaesthesia, a skin incision is made and a trocar with a needle is pushed through into the stomach under complete endoscopic visualisation.
·         A thread or a guide wire is inserted through the trocar after removing the needle and this thread is then snared. The endoscope is then withdrawn with the snare holding the thread.
·         A suitably sized PEG tube is then connected to the thread and the thread is pulled from the skin incision pulling the tube into the patient’s mouth through the oesophagus, to be retained in the stomach by the internal bolster. An external bolster is placed loosely on the skin.
·         The position of the inner opening of the tube should be checked by endoscopy.
·         In the past, commencing use of the tube has been delayed until 24 hours after insertion. There is now evidence that delaying use of the tube has no advantage over early feeding.

Benefits of PEG feeding
Benefits include:
·         It is well tolerated (better than nasogastric tubes).
·         Nutritional status is improved.
·         Ease of usage over other methods (nasogastric or oral feeding) reported by carers.
·         Satisfactory use by home carers.[9]
·         Low incidence of complications.
·         Reduction in aspiration pneumonia associated with swallowing disorders.
·         Cost-effective relative to alternative methods, particularly when reasonably long survival is expected.

Management after insertion
·         Education of carers and patients is essential to reduce tube problems and complications.
·         A number of studies indicate the support and education of patients should be multidisciplinary, involving:
·         Nurses (wound care and ostomy expertise).
·         Dietitians (nutritional advice and support).
·         Ongoing care involves:
·         Inspection and maintainance of the access device (see 'Care of PEG tube', below).
·         Wound care advice.
·         Nutritional support and advice.

Care of PEG tube
This routine care can be performed by the patient and/or the carers with suitable training. After about 10 days following insertion asepsis is not required.
·         Examine the skin for infection/irritation around the site.
·         Note the measuring guide number at the end of the external fixation device.
·         Remove the tube from the fixation device and ease away from the abdomen.
·         Clean the stoma site with sterile saline.
·         Dry the area with gauze.
·         Rotate the gastrostomy tube to prevent adherence to sides of the track.
·         Re-attach the external fixation device to the abdomen.
·         Attach the gastrostomy tube gently to the fixation device and position as before according to the mark/number on the tube.
·         Avoid use of bulky dressings.

Complications
Immediate (within 72 hours):
·         Endoscopy-related:
·         Haemorrhage or perforation.
·         Aspiration.
·         Oversedation.
·         Procedure-related:
·         Ileus.
·         Pneumoperitoneum.
·         Wound infection.
·         Wound bleeding.
·         Injury to the liver, bowel, or spleen.
Delayed:
·         Gastric outlet obstruction.
·         Buried bumper syndrome (migration of the internal bumper of the PEG tube into the gastric or abdominal wall).
·         Dislodged PEG tube.
·         Peritonitis.
·         Peristomal leakage or infection.
·         Skin or gastric ulceration.
·         Blocked PEG tube.
·         Tube degradation.
·         Gastric fistula after removal of the PEG tube.
·         Granulation around site of insertion of the PEG tube.

Prognosis
·         There have been few long-term follow-up studies. Clearly the overall mortality rate after PEG insertion is high because of the underlying medical problems.[13]

·         A five-year prospective study showed few complications from the procedure itself and improved nutritional status.